Legal Costs and the Importance of Settlement Offers
In cases before the courts, the starting point is that the party that has “won” the case is entitled to full compensation from the other party for its legal costs. Where neither party has “won” the case, the starting point is that the parties must bear their own legal costs. However, settlement offers made during legal proceedings may result in a party being awarded legal costs in the judgement even if the party has not won the case. In this update, we provide a brief introduction to what is important for a settlement offer to have a positive effect on the court’s decision on legal costs.
The EFTA Court’s Decision on Norwegian Hiring Rules
At the request of Oslo District Court, the EFTA Court has issued an advisory opinion in the form of a judgement on the interpretation of Article 36 of the EEA Agreement on freedom to provide services, etc. The case concerns the question of whether Norwegian hiring rules are in line with EEA law.
10 Pieces of Advice for Employers About Employees on Sick Leave
Sickness absence is a major cost for Norwegian companies, and there is a lot to be gained for organisations that have control of the regulations. It’s also important to ensure fair and efficient treatment of employees, while protecting the company from potential pitfalls.
Legal Costs Before Taking Out a Settlement Claim – Expression of Concern
Consumers often have grounds for claiming reimbursement of their actual legal expenses, even if they are higher than the limitations that follow from the Dispute Act’s provisions on legal costs, writes the author of the article.
New Directorate Strengthens Norway’s Export Control: What Does It Mean for Businesses?
The establishment of the new Norwegian Directorate for Export Controls and Sanctions (DEKSA) marks a significant step in strengthening Norway’s export control framework and compliance with international sanctions. But what does this mean for Norwegian businesses?