In a recently rendered HR-2024-334-A judgment, the question was whether the prohibition against transfers in Section 22 of the Constitution implies that two court leaders who, following the judicial reform in 2021, no longer hold leadership positions but are entitled to retain their title and salary, are obliged to work as ordinary judges in the merged courts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As a consequence of the merger of courts following the judicial reform in 2021, several court leaders became redundant in their leadership roles. The affected positions were continued as judicial offices in the merged courts, but in a way that allowed the incumbents to retain their title and salary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":14634,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-law"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n